Tom DeLay- Corporate Whore |
Details and arcticles of the constant selling of influence and other nefarious activities by House Majority Leader Tom Delay (Rep.-Texas) Be sure to visit our cavernous vault of archives. Also, feel free to visit our sister site, Dick Cheney-Corporate Criminal. Front page 07/01/2002 - 08/01/2002 11/01/2002 - 12/01/2002 02/01/2003 - 03/01/2003 03/01/2003 - 04/01/2003 05/01/2003 - 06/01/2003 06/01/2003 - 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 - 08/01/2003 08/01/2003 - 09/01/2003 09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003 10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003 11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003 12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004 01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004 02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007 Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
|
Found amid Enron's rubble: insight into Tom DeLay
By PAUL KRUGMAN New York Times July 14, 2004, 9:41PM PAUL KRUGMAN argues that while the House majority leader's current troubles may have come about by accident, his power in the Republican Party has not. FROM a business point of view, Enron is a smoking ruin. But there's important evidence in the rubble. If Enron hadn't collapsed, we might still have only circumstantial evidence that energy companies artificially drove up prices during California's electricity crisis. Because of that collapse, we have direct evidence in the form of the now-infamous Enron tapes — although the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Justice Department tried to prevent their release. Now, e-mail and other Enron documents are revealing why Tom DeLay, the House majority leader, is one of the most powerful men in America. A little background: At the Republican convention, most featured speakers will be social moderates such as Rudy Giuliani and Arnold Schwarzenegger. A moderate facade is necessary to win elections in a generally tolerant nation. But real power in the party rests with hard-line social conservatives such as DeLay, who, in the debate over gun control after the Columbine shootings, insisted that juvenile violence is the result of day care, birth control and the teaching of evolution. Here's the puzzle: If DeLay's brand of conservatism is so unpopular that it must be kept in the closet during the convention, how can people like him really run the party? In DeLay's case, a large part of the answer is his control over corporate cash. As far back as 1996, one analyst described DeLay as the "chief enforcer of company contributions to Republicans." Some of that cash has flowed through Americans for a Republican Majority, called Armpac, a political action committee DeLay founded in 1994. By dispensing that money to other legislators, he gains their allegiance; this, in turn, allows him to deliver favors to his corporate contributors. Four of the five Republicans on the House ethics committee, where a complaint has been filed against DeLay, are past recipients of Armpac money. The complaint, filed by Rep. Chris Bell of Houston, claims, among other things, that DeLay laundered illegal corporate contributions for use in Texas elections. And that's where Enron enters the picture. In May 2001, according to Monday's Washington Post, Enron lobbyists in Washington informed Ken Lay via e-mail that DeLay was seeking $100,000 in additional donations to his political action committee, with the understanding that it would be partly spent on "the redistricting effort in Texas." The Post says it has "at least a dozen" documents showing that DeLay and his associates directed money from corporate donors and lobbyists to an effort to win control of the Texas Legislature so the Republican Party could redraw the state's political districts. Enron, which helped launch Armpac, was happy to oblige, especially because DeLay was helping the firm's effort to secure energy deregulation legislation, even as its traders boasted to one another about how they were rigging California's deregulated market and stealing millions each day from "Grandma Millie." The Texas redistricting, like many of DeLay's actions, broke all the usual rules of political fair play. But when you believe, as DeLay does, that God is using you to promote a "biblical worldview" in politics, the usual rules don't apply. And the redistricting worked — it is a major reason why anything short of a Democratic tidal wave in November is likely to leave the House in Republican hands. There is, however, one problem: A 100-year-old Texas law bars corporate financing of state Legislature campaigns. An inquiry is under way, and DeLay has hired two criminal defense attorneys. Stay tuned. But you shouldn't conclude that the system is working. DeLay's current predicament is an accident. The party machine that he has done so much to create has eliminated most of the checks and balances in our government. Again and again, Republicans in Congress have closed ranks to block or emasculate politically inconvenient investigations. If Enron hadn't collapsed, and if Texas didn't still have a campaign finance law that is a relic of its populist past, DeLay would be in no danger at all. The larger picture is this: DeLay and his fellow hard-liners, whose values are far from the American mainstream, have forged an immensely effective alliance with corporate interests. And they may be just one election away from achieving a long-term lock on power. Krugman is a columnist for The New York Times and professor of economics and international affairs at Princeton University.
Comments:
Post a Comment
|